Guide · Updated July 2026
How to write a capability statement that actually gets read
The process behind a good capability statement — research, language, evidence and tailoring — not just the layout.
Most businesses treat writing a capability statement as a formatting exercise. They find a layout, fill in the boxes with material from their website, and export a PDF. The result is technically a capability statement and practically useless, because it answers the question "what does this business do?" instead of the question the buyer is actually asking, which is "can this business solve my specific problem without creating risk for me?"
The template gives you the structure. This guide covers the process that makes the structure work.
Step 1: Research the buyer before you write a word
A capability statement written in a vacuum reads like it was written in a vacuum. Before drafting, find out what this buyer actually buys and how they describe it.
- Read their published contract awards. Most Australian jurisdictions publish contract award notices. They tell you what the agency buys, at what value, and from whom. That is competitive intelligence available free.
- Read a past tender document. Even an expired one. The evaluation criteria reveal what this buyer weights — capability, price, local content, safety record.
- Identify the incumbent. If the same supplier has held the contract for eight years, your statement needs to give the buyer a reason to consider change.
- Note their strategic priorities. Agencies publish procurement strategies and annual reports. If an agency is publicly committed to reducing emissions or increasing Indigenous business spend, that is relevant to how you position.
Our guide to finding government tenders covers where award notices and tender archives live in each jurisdiction.
Step 2: Mirror the buyer's language
Government agencies use specific terminology, and using different terminology signals you are an outsider. If the agency's documents say "hydraulic services", write hydraulic services. If they say "grounds maintenance", do not write "landscaping". If they say "ICT professional services", do not write "IT consulting".
This is not about keyword stuffing. It is about reducing the cognitive work a buyer has to do to categorise you. When an evaluator is matching your statement against a requirement, identical terminology makes the match instant and different terminology makes them pause — and pauses cost you.
The same principle explains why our state-and-trade guides, like NSW plumbing tenders and Victorian cleaning tenders, spend time on which agency uses which term.
Step 3: Convert claims into evidence
This is the highest-leverage change most businesses can make. Go through your draft and find every assertion, then replace it with a fact.
| Claim (weak) | Evidence (strong) |
|---|---|
| Extensive experience in school projects | 27 school projects delivered since 2019 across 3 education regions |
| Reliable and responsive service | Average response time 3.2 hours against a 4 hour contractual SLA, 2025 calendar year |
| Strong safety culture | ISO 45001 certified since 2021, zero lost time injuries across 41,000 hours |
| Competitive pricing | Fixed schedule of rates held without variation across a 3 year council contract |
| Highly qualified team | 11 tradespeople, 4 holding TMV and backflow accreditation, 2 licensed supervisors |
Numbers are credible because they are checkable. Adjectives are not credible because anyone can write them. If you find you cannot put a number to a claim, that is useful information: either find the number or delete the claim.
Step 4: Choose past performance strategically
You are not listing your biggest projects. You are listing the projects most comparable to the work you want. Comparability has four dimensions:
- Client type — government beats private, same-agency beats different-agency
- Scope similarity — the same kind of work, described the same way
- Scale — similar contract value and site count
- Complexity — live sites, restricted access, compliance intensity
A $200k school refurbishment delivered in a holiday window is stronger evidence for a school tender than a $2m private commercial fitout, because it demonstrates you can work within the constraint that matters to that buyer.
If you genuinely lack comparable work, say what you do have and be explicit about the comparability logic. Buyers are used to assessing new entrants. What they will not do is guess on your behalf.
Step 5: Write differentiators that survive scrutiny
Test every differentiator with one question: could my three closest competitors write this same sentence? If yes, it is not a differentiator, it is a table stake.
"Committed to quality", "customer focused", "family owned and operated" — all fail the test. What passes:
- A depot location that produces a response time competitors cannot match
- An accreditation that only a handful of businesses in the state hold
- Crew capacity that enables parallel multi-site delivery in a compressed window
- Security-cleared personnel, which matters enormously in Canberra — see ACT ICT tenders
- Registered Indigenous business status, relevant under the Indigenous Procurement Policy
Step 6: Cut it back to two pages
Write long, then cut hard. The discipline of a two page limit forces you to remove the material that was there for your comfort rather than the buyer's benefit — company history, mission statements, generic capability claims.
A useful editing pass: read each sentence and ask whether a buyer deciding between you and a competitor would change their mind based on it. If not, delete it.
Step 7: Tailor before every use
Keep a master document, then adjust for each use. Reorder capabilities so the relevant one leads. Swap past performance to the most comparable projects. Adjust differentiators to the buyer's stated priorities. This takes fifteen minutes and materially changes how the document lands.
The compliance and snapshot sections stay static, which is why keeping licence numbers and insurance limits current in your master matters — see insurance requirements for tenders for what limits to expect.
What to do with it once written
A capability statement sitting in a folder generates nothing. Use it actively: attach it to tender responses and EOIs, send it to head contractors when pursuing subcontract work, bring copies to industry briefings, and email it to agency contract managers after a debrief.
Before it goes anywhere, run it through the capability statement checklist. Then find something to aim it at — browse open opportunities on our tender feeds, or narrow to your sector with cleaning tenders or electrical tenders.
Frequently asked questions
How long does it take to write a good capability statement?
Plan for a full day for the first version, most of it spent gathering past performance details and finding real numbers rather than writing. Subsequent tailoring takes fifteen to thirty minutes per opportunity. The research and evidence gathering is the work; the writing is comparatively quick.
Should I hire someone to write my capability statement?
A professional writer can improve structure and clarity, but they cannot supply your past performance data, contract values, response times or safety statistics. If you engage help, gather the evidence first — otherwise you are paying for polish on content that lacks substance.
How often should I update it?
Refresh past performance whenever you complete a notable project, and review compliance details at least annually or whenever insurance and licences renew. A statement whose most recent project is three years old actively works against you.
Can I use the same capability statement for private and government work?
The core content overlaps, but government versions should emphasise compliance credentials, licences, insurance limits and screening, which private clients rarely scrutinise as closely. Maintaining two variants of the same master is straightforward and worth doing.
Does design matter or just content?
Content matters far more, but presentation signals professionalism. A clean, readable two page PDF with your logo and consistent formatting is sufficient. Elaborate design will not compensate for unquantified claims, and poor formatting can undermine strong content.